<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ariejan.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ariejan.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ariejan.net</link>
	<description>May The Source Be With You.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta3-9750</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on SVN: How to release software properly by Kingsley</title>
		<link>http://ariejan.net/2006/11/21/svn-how-to-release-software-properly/comment-page-1/#comment-10638</link>
		<dc:creator>Kingsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.ariejan.net/?p=41#comment-10638</guid>
		<description>The ruby on rails framework looks great and may solve another issue we are looking at but doesnt help me with version control.

The upgrade scripts would be massive and it would take many hours to run in just a couple of new objects. When all i want from my config management tool is for it to understand which files are in a release and to only extract those files.

I run a 8 terrabyte database with 50000+ objects. To use this method and go through each table and look at the versions would be crazy. We dont run several different versions of the DB only 1 so the ruby approach would not be much help.

I would have thought it would be a simple SVN issue to only package the files that are needed for the release rather than the entire branch???

I thank you for your help...

9-5 Frustrated :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ruby on rails framework looks great and may solve another issue we are looking at but doesnt help me with version control.</p>
<p>The upgrade scripts would be massive and it would take many hours to run in just a couple of new objects. When all i want from my config management tool is for it to understand which files are in a release and to only extract those files.</p>
<p>I run a 8 terrabyte database with 50000+ objects. To use this method and go through each table and look at the versions would be crazy. We dont run several different versions of the DB only 1 so the ruby approach would not be much help.</p>
<p>I would have thought it would be a simple SVN issue to only package the files that are needed for the release rather than the entire branch???</p>
<p>I thank you for your help&#8230;</p>
<p>9-5 Frustrated :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to: Compile packages on Debian/Ubuntu by hand by Raul Huertas</title>
		<link>http://ariejan.net/2008/05/04/how-to-compile-packages-on-debianubuntu-by-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-10637</link>
		<dc:creator>Raul Huertas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariejan.net/?p=248#comment-10637</guid>
		<description>you are cool! *****</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are cool! *****</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SVN: How to release software properly by Ariejan de Vroom</title>
		<link>http://ariejan.net/2006/11/21/svn-how-to-release-software-properly/comment-page-1/#comment-10636</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariejan de Vroom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.ariejan.net/?p=41#comment-10636</guid>
		<description>@Kingsley: if you look at Ruby on Rails, there is also database development involved. The Rails way is to store your changes in separate, numbered files. This way you can define what "version" of your database model you're currently running. 

Read http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Migration.html for more details about Rails migrations. It may give you some great ideas to solve your own issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kingsley: if you look at Ruby on Rails, there is also database development involved. The Rails way is to store your changes in separate, numbered files. This way you can define what &#8220;version&#8221; of your database model you&#8217;re currently running. </p>
<p>Read <a href="http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Migration.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/api.rubyonrails.org');">http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Migration.html</a> for more details about Rails migrations. It may give you some great ideas to solve your own issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SVN: How to release software properly by Kingsley</title>
		<link>http://ariejan.net/2006/11/21/svn-how-to-release-software-properly/comment-page-1/#comment-10635</link>
		<dc:creator>Kingsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.ariejan.net/?p=41#comment-10635</guid>
		<description>The version above works for applications where you extract a bunch of source files and create them from scratch such as a Java App or a C++ app. 

What about for database development where the changes are iterative.  I have 4000 procedures but only want to update say 2 or 3. 

Im stuggling to mkake subversion extract just the files i have changed. I still want to retain the history of those files as i cant be sure when i will be releasing cases(Containing objects).

Does anyone have experience in this area? 

Am i looking at this the wrong way?

Or is this just the wrong tool for the job? (Its been forced on me by company policy)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The version above works for applications where you extract a bunch of source files and create them from scratch such as a Java App or a C++ app. </p>
<p>What about for database development where the changes are iterative.  I have 4000 procedures but only want to update say 2 or 3. </p>
<p>Im stuggling to mkake subversion extract just the files i have changed. I still want to retain the history of those files as i cant be sure when i will be releasing cases(Containing objects).</p>
<p>Does anyone have experience in this area? </p>
<p>Am i looking at this the wrong way?</p>
<p>Or is this just the wrong tool for the job? (Its been forced on me by company policy)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Subversion: How to revert to a previous revision by steve</title>
		<link>http://ariejan.net/2007/03/27/subversion-how-to-revert-to-a-previous-revision/comment-page-1/#comment-10634</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 05:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.ariejan.net/?p=99#comment-10634</guid>
		<description>Excellent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to resolve Subversion Conflicts by Donald Sheng</title>
		<link>http://ariejan.net/2007/07/04/how-to-resolve-subversion-conflicts/comment-page-1/#comment-10633</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Sheng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.ariejan.net/?p=141#comment-10633</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much!  Having been using SVN for a few years, for the first time I want to read word by word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much!  Having been using SVN for a few years, for the first time I want to read word by word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to digg-proof your WordPress blog by Ariejan de Vroom</title>
		<link>http://ariejan.net/2008/07/09/how-to-digg-proof-your-wordpress-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-10632</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariejan de Vroom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariejan.net/?p=258#comment-10632</guid>
		<description>I did use nginx for a while, but I got tired of having to run FastCGI processes to execute PHP code. Besides that, there were some issues, especially with rewrite rules, that were all solved by moving back to Apache. Another reason for me to use Apache is Passenger (mod_rails).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did use nginx for a while, but I got tired of having to run FastCGI processes to execute PHP code. Besides that, there were some issues, especially with rewrite rules, that were all solved by moving back to Apache. Another reason for me to use Apache is Passenger (mod_rails).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to digg-proof your WordPress blog by nomadhacker</title>
		<link>http://ariejan.net/2008/07/09/how-to-digg-proof-your-wordpress-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-10631</link>
		<dc:creator>nomadhacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ariejan.net/?p=258#comment-10631</guid>
		<description>Another way to digg-proof your site: use a lightweight web server like nginx or lighttpd.  And Slicehost has a lot of great articles on how to use nginx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another way to digg-proof your site: use a lightweight web server like nginx or lighttpd.  And Slicehost has a lot of great articles on how to use nginx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rails: Group results by week (using group_by) by Victor</title>
		<link>http://ariejan.net/2007/01/12/rails-group-results-by-week-using-group_by/comment-page-1/#comment-10630</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 04:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.ariejan.net/?p=70#comment-10630</guid>
		<description>@items.keys.sort.each do &#124;release_date&#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@items.keys.sort.each do |release_date|</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rails: Group results by week (using group_by) by Victor</title>
		<link>http://ariejan.net/2007/01/12/rails-group-results-by-week-using-group_by/comment-page-1/#comment-10629</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 04:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.ariejan.net/?p=70#comment-10629</guid>
		<description>Whoops, forgot to add the view code:
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, forgot to add the view code:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
